Lodestar Oncology Advisors helps teams select the right target, the right molecule, and the right patients, whether they're building, evaluating, or investing in oncology programs.
Biotechs often bring on a prominent academic advisor for input on the platform or pipeline. Having sat in those meetings, I have noticed a pattern: the advisor's calendar rarely allows for the deep review that would deliver meaningful insights. The internal scientific team is often left wanting more substantive input.
Lodestar is built for that gap: an experienced advisor who thinks out of the box and is recognized for uncovering hidden biological insights.
Engagements are scoped to a specific decision: a target to progress, a screen to design, a platform to build out. The advice is grounded on hands-on discovery experience, not general strategy.
The right target is required for tumor maintenance and has a biomarker associated with the tumor that explains the selective dependency.
What that produces: a ranked list of targets, each scored against dependency evidence and a biomarker rationale.
Beyond evaluating what internal teams have, novel targets can be proposed. Each new target idea comes with a defined therapeutic hypothesis and a concrete, testable path to validation.
Typical output: a shortlist of candidate targets, each with a one-page thesis and a defined validation experiment.
Structural review of binding pockets and protein–protein interaction surfaces to judge whether a target suits a small molecule, a degrader, or a molecular glue approach, and which is worth pursuing first.
The deliverable: a structural review flagging which targets suit a small molecule, a degrader, or a glue, and which don't.
Genetic (CRISPR, RNAi) screening strategies and chemical (biochemical, cellular, phenotypic) screen strategies, with particular expertise in induced-proximity and covalent hit-finding screens.
In practice: a screening plan covering assay format, library, and controls, sized to the biology and the modality.
Assay cascade design that carries validated hits through hit-to-lead and lead optimization, sequenced for potency, selectivity, and mechanism confirmation rather than run as a generic panel.
Comes back as: an assay cascade sequenced from primary screen through mechanism confirmation, ready to hand to chemistry.
Analysis of the clinical path by determining the unmet medical need of the targeted population and comparing the new treatment to the standard of care and other programs in development.
End result: a competitive map and a one-page differentiation argument for the program.
Teams and investors at very different stages of an oncology program, all facing the same question: is this target worth the bet?
Models surface candidate targets faster than a lean biology team can validate them. An outside read triages the list against genetic and mechanistic evidence before wet-lab resourcing follows. That can include directing CRO work to experimentally validate what the model predicts.
Often looks like: a short sprint validating the top model-ranked targets before committing wet-lab time to any of them.
Founding a company before the scientific team exists. Help building the initial pipeline around the company's strategy.
A typical ask: a short list of targets with clear scientific rationale.
A platform (degrader, glue, or otherwise) is only as good as the targets chosen to prove it out. The work is ranking candidate targets and indications against what the modality can actually do.
What this usually means: narrowing a long list of candidate indications down to the few the platform is actually built to hit.
Screens to identify hits against a lab's target or pathway, and assays to validate and optimize those hits. The aim is moving a discovery from bench biology toward a drug discovery program.
One example: designing a hit-finding screen sized to what an academic budget and timeline can actually support.
An independent scientific read on a program's target thesis or a founder's pitch, before a term sheet is signed.
The shape of it: a focused, days-long read on a single target thesis ahead of a partner meeting.
In-licensing or partnership evaluations need a fast, independent read on the target or platform science, separate from the deal team driving the negotiation.
Most often: a focused diligence read on a target or platform's science before terms are negotiated.
Biological insight only counts if it can be translated into a medicine. That's the bar every target has to clear. — Operating principle at Lodestar
Agustin Chicas, Ph.D. LinkedIn
Twenty-plus years of oncology drug discovery experience spanning academia and industry. The academic work focused on the role of tumor suppressors (RB, p53), oncogenes (RAS), and epigenetic regulators in cancer and cellular senescence, published in Cancer Cell, Genes & Development, PNAS, and Nature. The drug discovery experience spans four biotechs, each built around a different discovery platform. Most recently Head of Early Discovery at Expedition Medicines. Previously, founding member and Head of Discovery Biology at Monte Rosa Therapeutics. Earlier, Head of the Target Discovery group at Forma Therapeutics. Author of 20 peer-reviewed publications, including 7 first-author articles. Named inventor on patents related to the GSPT1 program and work at Third Rock Ventures.